A federal choose has dominated that Aetna wasn’t being truthful when the well being insurer stated final summer time that its choice to drag out of most Obamacare exchanges was strictly a enterprise choice triggered by mounting losses.
U.S. District Choose John Bates concluded this week that Aetna’s actual motivation for dropping Obamacare protection in a number of states was “particularly to evade judicial scrutiny” over its merger with Humana.
Aetna pulled out of Obamacare exchanges in 11 states final August, together with 17 counties in Florida, Georgia and Missouri the place the Division of Justice argued the merger would wipe out competitors.
That call to retreat from Obamacare got here only a month after the Division of Justice blocked Aetna’s $34 billion merger with Humana on antitrust grounds.
However Bates stated this week the DOJ offered “persuasive assist” — together with inside Aetna emails — for the conclusion that Aetna (AET) withdrew from the Obamacare exchanges in these counties “to enhance its litigation place.”
“The Court docket doesn’t credit score the minimal efforts of Aetna executives to assert in any other case,” Bates wrote in a ruling following a trial over the merger.
He added that Aetna’s choice concerning participation within the 2017 exchanges in these counties was “actually manipulated.”
Associated: Trump and Obamacare: The place we go from right here
Aetna had warned the federal government it could have to dump then-President Obama’s signature healthcare legislation if the U.S. scuttled its take care of Humana (HUM).
“It is extremely doubtless that we would wish to depart the general public change enterprise totally…ought to our deal finally be blocked,” Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini wrote in a letter to the DOJ final July that was obtained by the Huffington Publish.
Nonetheless, Bates stated it is clear that “Aetna tried to leverage its participation within the change for favorable remedy” from regulators.
The choose stated there may be “persuasive proof” that when Aetna later withdrew from the 17 counties in query, “it didn’t achieve this for enterprise causes, however as an alternative to comply with by means of on the risk that it made earlier.”
This critique was buried in a 158-page ruling issued by Bates on Monday, during which he blocked Aetna’s merger with Humana as a result of anti-competitive considerations.
The ruling offers an enormous blow to each corporations at a time of nice uncertainty within the well being care trade now that President Donald Trump has talked about rolling again a number of key provisions of Obamacare.
Aetna-Humana is not the one huge well being care merger unsure. The DOJ additionally sued to dam the takeover of Cigna (CI) by Blue Cross Blue Defend chief Anthem (ANTX) for anti-competitive causes.
Aetna declined to touch upon specifics of the opinion, together with the criticism from Bates, as a result of it is nonetheless “reviewing the main points.”
Associated: Whilst they repeal Obamacare, Republicans nonetheless must fund it
Final summer time, Aetna defined its choice to withdraw from most Obamacare exchanges by saying its particular person insurance policies enterprise had misplaced $430 million for the reason that exchanges opened in January 2014.
Nonetheless, the choose famous that Aetna stored its assist for exchanges in money-losing states like Delaware, Iowa and Virginia — however dumped Florida, although that huge state was projected to be worthwhile in 2016.
The ruling quoted an e-mail from Christopher Ciano, president of Aetna’s Florida market, to Jonathan Mayhew, head of Aetna’s change enterprise, exhibiting how shocked he was by the choice to depart Florida.
“I simply can’t make sense out of the Florida choice. By no means thought we’d pull the plug all collectively,” Ciano wrote, including that Aetna was “earning money from the on-exchange enterprise.”
Mayhew responded by requesting to debate by telephone “as an alternative of e-mail.”
Bates stated the response from the senior Aetna exec was an instance of Aetna’s “repeated efforts to hide a paper path about this decision-making.”
–CNNMoney’s Tami Luhby contributed to this report
CNNMoney (New York) First revealed January 24, 2017: 12:36 PM ET
