For example, as Foser writes, The New York Times ran 10 articles in five days largely about the false pet-eating claims. While they did a great job labeling the statements as false, the volume of coverage kept immigration—a topic Trump and Vance want front and center—dominating the news cycle. As Foser notes, “Even articles debunking Trump’s lies privilege them, centering his preferred campaign themes.”
So, what’s the alternative? Foser suggests that the press should shift the focus from the content of the lies to the liars themselves. Highlight the dangerous implications of politicians willing to fabricate stories to manipulate public opinion. Examine the motives behind these falsehoods. Are they distracting from policy failures? Inciting a base that thrives on fear and division? These are the questions that need answers.
Consider the real-world consequences of these lies. In Springfield, the false narrative about Haitian immigrants led to bomb threats against schools and city offices. Republican Mayor Rob Rue expressed his frustration, stating that national politicians “mischaracterize what is actually going on and misrepresent our community.” Ohio Governor Mike DeWine, also a Republican, labeled the pet-eating claims as “garbage.” Yet Trump and Vance remain undeterred, continuing to spread misinformation without a shred of evidence.
