On Friday, the US Division of Homeland Safety introduced the formation of an Synthetic Intelligence Security and Safety Board that consists of twenty-two members pulled from the tech {industry}, authorities, academia, and civil rights organizations. However given the nebulous nature of the time period “AI,” which might apply to a broad spectrum of pc know-how, it is unclear if this group will even be capable of agree on what precisely they’re safeguarding us from.
President Biden directed DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas to ascertain the board, which can meet for the primary time in early Could and subsequently on a quarterly foundation.
The basic assumption posed by the board’s existence, and mirrored in Biden’s AI government order from October, is that AI is an inherently dangerous know-how and that Americans and companies have to be shielded from its misuse. Alongside these strains, the objective of the group is to assist guard towards overseas adversaries utilizing AI to disrupt US infrastructure; develop suggestions to make sure the secure adoption of AI tech into transportation, vitality, and Web companies; foster cross-sector collaboration between authorities and companies; and create a discussion board the place AI leaders to share info on AI safety dangers with the DHS.
It is price noting that the ill-defined nature of the time period “Synthetic Intelligence” does the brand new board no favors relating to scope and focus. AI can imply many alternative issues: It might probably energy a chatbot, fly an airplane, management the ghosts in Pac-Man, regulate the temperature of a nuclear reactor, or play an awesome sport of chess. It may be all these issues and extra, and since lots of these functions of AI work very in another way, there isn’t any assure any two folks on the board can be desirous about the identical kind of AI.
This confusion is mirrored within the quotes supplied by the DHS press launch from new board members, a few of whom are already speaking about several types of AI. Whereas OpenAI, Microsoft, and Anthropic are monetizing generative AI methods like ChatGPT primarily based on massive language fashions (LLMs), Ed Bastian, the CEO of Delta Air Traces, refers to thoroughly completely different courses of machine studying when he says, “By driving revolutionary instruments like crew resourcing and turbulence prediction, AI is already making vital contributions to the reliability of our nation’s air journey system.”
So, defining the scope of what AI precisely means—and which functions of AI are new or harmful—may be one of many key challenges for the brand new board.
A roundtable of Large Tech CEOs attracts criticism
For the inaugural assembly of the AI Security and Safety Board, the DHS chosen a tech industry-heavy group, populated with CEOs of 4 main AI distributors (Sam Altman of OpenAI, Satya Nadella of Microsoft, Sundar Pichai of Alphabet, and Dario Amodei of Anthopic), CEO Jensen Huang of prime AI chipmaker Nvidia, and representatives from different main tech firms like IBM, Adobe, Amazon, Cisco, and AMD. There are additionally reps from massive aerospace and aviation: Northrop Grumman and Delta Air Traces.
Upon studying the announcement, some critics took challenge with the board composition. On LinkedIn, founding father of The Distributed AI Analysis Institute (DAIR) Timnit Gebru particularly criticized OpenAI’s presence on the board and wrote, “I’ve now seen the total checklist and it’s hilarious. Foxes guarding the hen home is an understatement.”
