Listed below are as we speak’s Ottawa Solar letters to the editor.
Article content material
PICKING ON PIERRE
Commercial 2
Article content material
To not belabour the purpose, however once more we see the predominating Liberal bias and affect of the media.
Following the dustup over the “wacko prime minister” labelling within the Home of Commons, a lot of the anti-Conservative media continued to report Pierre Poilievre was ejected from the Home for refusing to withdraw his unparliamentary comment.
Article content material
Whereas he did refuse a number of requests from the Speaker, on the ultimate time Poilievre was clearly heard to say, “I withdraw the remark and substitute with the aforementioned adjectives.” Whereas maybe not probably the most elegant or honest withdrawal, he did the truth is use the phrase “withdraw.” But the Liberal-biased media principally reported — incorrectly — that Poilievre didn’t withdraw the remark. He did!
Commercial 3
Article content material
Moreover, quite than settle for that and transfer on to defuse the scenario, the “non-impartial” Speaker compounded and infected issues by then “naming” Poilievre and ejecting him from the chamber.
Whereas not defending Poilievre’s techniques, it’s clear Fergus realized nothing from his “congratulatory message video” incident, whereas sporting his Speaker’s gown, about being neutral.
MIKE ALAIN
OTTAWA
WE PROTEST — OVER AND OVER
With the announcement of three days per week of labor in-person with the federal authorities, anticipate extra protests. What sort of society have we turn out to be? Nothing appears to be proper. As I mentioned earlier than and I say it once more, we now have discovered the whole lot beneath the solar, together with the solar, to protest. Welcome to as we speak’s world.
Commercial 4
Article content material
ANANT NAGPUR
OTTAWA
MORE PRESSING ISSUES
I’ve completely no drawback with the LGBTQ group; as I’ve at all times mentioned, folks love who they love and may have that proper. Having mentioned that, nonetheless, I discover spending $8 million of our tax {dollars} on a monument to the group pointless when we now have extra urgent points that want funding. Inexpensive housing and well being care come to thoughts.
The cash spend on monuments is out of hand and the land used to situate them on might be higher used as effectively. This madness has to cease.
SANDY JOHNSTON
GREELY
HAVE YOUR SAY
Your letters are welcome, at: OttSun.Oped@sunmedia.ca. Embrace your first and final identify AND metropolis/city. Maintain your letters quick — and please attempt to be civil, even when criticizing or disagreeing. We edit for accuracy, size, readability and authorized considerations.
Really helpful from Editorial
Article content material