The Coalition is now badly cut up over Peter Dutton’s push to construct a nuclear energy business from scratch, adequate to delay what was as soon as trumpeted by his cheerleaders as a daring pre-budget announcement of a brand new period in Australian power coverage.
9’s James Massola, who final month uncovered what number of Coalition MPs had been all for nuclear energy, however simply not of their electorates thanks, yesterday pinpointed what the actual driver behind Dutton’s push is — decreasing Australia’s emissions abatement targets, adequate to take us out of the Paris Settlement.
Coalition MPs are understandably nervous about going to an election promising to impose half a dozen potential Fukushimas on voters, albeit with the caveat that there’ll be no threat, only a very giant building website, till the 2040s. Dutton has mused about bribing voters within the goal electorates to simply accept nuclear energy crops, and presumably with greater than the iodine tablets the British governments fingers out to residents and staff across the UK’s nuclear submarine amenities.
The issue with bribing voters like that’s that it’s a de facto admission that there’s one thing problematic about nuclear energy — in any other case, why do you’re feeling the necessity to do it? We don’t bribe voters who dwell close to coal-fired energy crops. We don’t even compensate them for the tons of of untimely deaths that happen due to them.
Fortunately there’s an answer at hand for Dutton, and it springs from his on-again, off-again love of small modular reactors (SMR) (watch how the opposition chief geese the query when requested by David Speers about the truth that there’s no such factor as a working SMR in a Western nation).
Regardless that SMRs produce energy that’s much more costly than standard nuclear energy crops whereas having the identical security issues, theoretically they’d be faster to construct, not price as a lot and will even be moved round. The issue is that you simply want much more of them than a standard nuclear reactor of the sort that may take 20 years and $10 billion to construct.
So neglect solely placing a reactor in six electorates — put one in each voters. It could be a lot fairer than subjecting solely a handful of voters to bearing the prices of the online zero transition by having a nuclear reactor close by. This, absolutely, is the advantage of SMRs — they are often put the place power customers are slightly than at areas that can require intensive and costly transmission traces.
Dutton’s pitch to voters could be easy: 151 SMRs throughout the nation. Some electorates may even have two or three, relying on the power use there, however everybody would get a reactor close by. As an alternative of reactors in Gippsland, and the Hunter Valley and Gladstone, there’d be a reactor in Sutherland and Penrith and dotted throughout the outer western suburbs of Sydney, and one in Frankston and Belgrave and the Mornington Peninsula in Victoria, and one in Ipswich and Fortitude Valley in Queensland and proper up the coast, and reactors throughout Adelaide and liberally scattered over Perth and 5 of them in Tasmania.
Most Australians wouldn’t should be quite a lot of kilometres from a nuclear reactor; solely folks residing in regional communities would dwell a ways from one — except they bought two or three of them. By leveraging off the benefits of SMRs, that is the wise and truthful resolution to the Coalition’s downside that individuals don’t need a potential nuclear accident down the highway. Everybody shares the burden equally.
And if there’s a security incident along with your native SMR, they’re solely little, so the radiation would solely have an effect on a couple of sq. kilometres of a significant metropolis or suburb. We’re not speaking Chernobyl right here. Evacuate the faculties and the hospitals, inform folks to depart their properties for a couple of days, shut the companies for a few weeks, distribute the iodine drugs — it’s a small value to pay for the transition to internet zero. The youngsters may even benefit from the vacation whereas their faculty is scrubbed clear of radioactive particles.
You understand it is smart. However does Peter Dutton?
How would you’re feeling a couple of nuclear reactor up the highway? Tell us your ideas by writing to letters@crikey.com.au. Please embody your full title to be thought-about for publication. We reserve the suitable to edit for size and readability.